The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences (OEIS)

Revision History for A238006

(Bold, blue-underlined text is an ; faded, red-underlined text is a ~~deletion~~.)
Showing entries 1-10 | older changes

Number of strict partitions of n such that (greatest part) - (least part) > (number of parts).
(history; published version)

#18 by Alois P. Heinz at Sun Sep 12 14:12:47 EDT 2021

STATUS

proposed

#17 by Omar E. Pol at Sun Sep 12 08:32:58 EDT 2021

STATUS

editing

Discussion

Sun Sep 12

14:12

Alois P. Heinz: ok, thank you ...

#16 by Omar E. Pol at Sun Sep 12 08:32:42 EDT 2021

COMMENTS

Since A000009(0) = 1 and A003056(0) = 0 here a(0) could be equal to 1 with offset 0. - Omar E. Pol, Sep 11 2021

#15 by Alois P. Heinz at Sun Sep 12 00:31:58 EDT 2021

STATUS

proposed

Discussion

Sun Sep 12

08:32

Omar E. Pol: Dear Professor Alois: thank you for the explanation. Removed the comment.

#14 by Omar E. Pol at Sat Sep 11 17:36:50 EDT 2021

STATUS

editing

Discussion

Sat Sep 11

17:37

Omar E. Pol: Added two formulas.

Sun Sep 12

00:31

Alois P. Heinz: for a(0):  number of parts = 0 but greatest part and least part are not defined, they do not exist, so a(0) is not defined ... and if you assume greatest part = least part, then the difference is 0 and not greater than the number of parts.  So your comment does not make sense.

#13 by Omar E. Pol at Sat Sep 11 17:36:47 EDT 2021

COMMENTS

Since A000009(0) = 1 and A003056(0) = 0 here with offset 0 a(0) could be equal to 1. - Omar E. Pol, Sep 11 2021

STATUS

proposed

#12 by Omar E. Pol at Sat Sep 11 17:26:51 EDT 2021

STATUS

editing

#11 by Omar E. Pol at Sat Sep 11 15:42:08 EDT 2021

COMMENTS

Since A000009(0) = 1 and A003056(0) = 0 here a(0) could be equal to 1. - Omar E. Pol, Sep 11 2021

Discussion

Sat Sep 11

15:48

Omar E. Pol: If the comment is not correct so please remove it.

#10 by Omar E. Pol at Sat Sep 11 15:39:23 EDT 2021

COMMENTS

#9 by Omar E. Pol at Sat Sep 11 15:30:02 EDT 2021

FORMULA

STATUS

approved