Wow - I was going to leave a similar message to Brotherbog below - I hope this is the correct way to do so :) In addition, all the "MrEarlGray's" edits have a racial/religious dimension/bias. cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josibald (talkcontribs) 00:19, 3 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi Brandon

edit

Great Panda pic!

I was wondering if you could just keep an eye on shahid malik which you're semi-protecting. Some subtle but negative edits attempted. I've left a reasonable message on the relevant talk page but I'm a novice....

thank you.


Brotherblog (talk) 05:07, 3 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wow - I was going to leave a similar message to Brotherbog below - I hope this is the correct way to do so :) In addition, all the "MrEarlGray's" edits have a racial/religious dimension/bias. cheers.

I think ive placed the message incorrectly but it relates to the page 'Shahid malik'. cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josibald (talkcontribs) 00:22, 3 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Pegasus edit

edit

Hey I saw you undid my edit on the Pegasus spyware article and I'm not sure why. HYTEN CREW (talk) 13:23, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

You changed the spelling of defense from American English to British English without explanation. Brandon (talk) 13:46, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Maybe you should have put that reason into the edit summary. That may also make reverts feel less rude/condescending. 103.219.194.134 (talk) 09:24, 30 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
why would you say this HYTEN CREW (talk) 01:09, 31 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Nice panda bear

edit

Thanks for cleaning up all that promotional content. They should put you on payroll for that. Drmies (talk) 03:06, 8 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! I genuinely appreciate the recognition. It normally comes from the marketing team I ran afoul of and is less polite. :) Brandon (talk) 04:42, 8 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Edit conflict

edit

Seems your edit (diff) accidentally deleted another's reply. – 2804:F1...17:EDFC (::/32) (talk) 18:54, 17 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Indeed it did, thank you for letting me know. It appears they already restored their comment, sorry about that NewBorders. Brandon (talk) 19:04, 17 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
That's fine ^^ I suspected it was just an innocent mistake. Good day to you. NewBorders (talk) 19:05, 17 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Edit Filter Help

edit

Hello,

I tried to add a relevant audio to Brighton, but a filter prohibited me from publishing my edit. Perhaps my edit summary was off-topic, but I do not intend to vandalize Wikipedia. How can we resolve this conflict?

Thank you Flame, not lame 💔 (Don't talk to me.) 13:27, 23 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Seeking feedback about an edit request to the Cloudinary article

edit

Hi @Brandon, I see you've made some edits to the Cloudinary article recently. I was hoping to get your feedback on a suggestion I've made to the intro paragraph. I think the opening sentence is weak since it only describes the company as a "SaaS technology company" and is front loaded with a list of cities with corporate offices. In my suggestion I've move the description of the technology up and bumped the cites to a second sentence since that information seems less important.

I'm a connected contributor and i've tagged the COI request for review, but I was hoping to get your thoughts since you're a recent contributor to the article. Thanks for the help and any feedback is appreciated.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cloudinary

Thanks! SBCornelius (talk) 21:00, 29 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Certification on demand

edit

I've added another source. What do you think? Bearian (talk) 06:04, 2 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

I'm still not sure I understand the purpose of the article. "Certification on demand" seems to be a concept unique to qualified electronic signature and specifically mobile qualified electronic signature at that. Given mobile QES does not seem to be explained in any existing article, how about a redirect to qualified electronic signature? Brandon (talk) 23:17, 3 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Lift ban on URL and assure that it will not be used again

edit

Hi Brandon

scalefusion.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Link requested to be whitelisted: scalefusion.com

Greetings team

People from my organization few years back added their direct link instead of wiki link to the wiki page over and over without understanding the guidelines and community rules by wiki.

The page they added scalefusion URL to was the 'List of MDM software' wikipedia page.

Now, when I joined new in the org. and tried to add our name to wiki list again as an added MDM provider in the market and added LinkedIn page link there, It got removed again. Then I did my research and got to know from employees of Wikipedia on LinkedIn (Mohanananda and Shivam Patel) that wiki doesn't allow website links so they banned my organization's URL few years back. So, I request you to please lift the ban from the given URL and I will make sure that we don't put it up there unnecessarily.

Please help me lift the URL ban and I assure to follow guidelines. My organization's URL is scalefusion.com. Not pasting the link here to avoid hyperlinking.

I assure this will not happen again from our end. Please consider this as a request and I will be grateful to you. Sakshi Singh Das (talk) 06:44, 18 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Precious anniversary

edit
Precious
 
Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:13, 18 February 2025 (UTC)Reply