Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Food and drink

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Food and drink. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Food and drink|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Food and drink. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Food and drink/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Food and drink

Olesia Ostafiieva

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely promotional page about a PR person created by UPE; the person doesn't pass GNG - holding not notable positions: PR specialist, secretary in the local council, editor in chief of not notable media. 89KimberlyRoad (talk) 11:39, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Businesspeople, Women, Food and drink, Journalism, and Ukraine. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:43, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cristina Cleghorn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. The google news coverage lacks SIGCOV about her, and includes a lot of public media releases from the Public Health Communications Centre. Also fails WP:PROF for low citation count. LibStar (talk) 06:17, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Women, Food and drink, and Health and fitness. LibStar (talk) 06:17, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. LibStar (talk) 06:20, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:PROF#C1. Perhaps the nominator can explain why 12 publications with triple-digit citations [1] is "low citation count" for nutrition, because it looks high to me. (I don't know why she uses both Christine and Cristina, but it's clearly the same person; you need to search for both.) Most of the nomination is irrelevant because it's about the wrong notability criterion, WP:BIO; WP:PROF is independent and uses different criteria. There's also a case for #C7 through mainstream coverage of her work [2] [3]. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:19, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sun Crush

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPRODUCT. No reliable sources. This is a brand produced by a company owned by Sri Lankan cricketer Muttiah Muralitharan. Information can be hosted there under a new heading called business venture. Chanaka L (talk) 02:11, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Products, and Sri Lanka. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete under NPRODUCT. Also promotional, as a side note. (Acer's userpage |what did I do now) 02:16, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, concur it fails WP:NPRODUCT, lacks any in-depth coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. Dan arndt (talk) 02:46, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG, nothing really that's worth merging into the owner's page since it's mostly WP:OR. The brand should be mentioned on his page though, as a business venture. jolielover♥talk 04:27, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as the creator of the article, I understand that it fails WP:NPRODUCT and WP:GNG. I'll get better as I go on!

🔥FERO𝕏IDAN🔥talk — Preceding undated comment added 13:21, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Paniel Meat Processing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This evidently fails WP:ORGCRIT without stressing. The sources do not add any pinch of salt to ORGCRIT for the company in question. Of course, WP:GNG is not satisfied either. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:18, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Business, Companies, Africa, and Mauritius. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:18, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per the nominator. Afro 📢Talk! 12:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:40, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Yet another corporate article that talks more about its finances than what the company actually does in practice. Nathannah • 📮 00:19, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - References do not meet WP:ORGCRIT. Creator should have improved in draft space prior to moving back but here we are. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:56, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. doesn't have enough proper sources to establish notability. Darkm777 (talk) 02:52, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chinook olives

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article relies on a single source which itself acknowledges that the existence of the practice is dubious. A preliminary Google search yields no sources, which leads me to believe that this isn't notable and may not even be real. Penguin314 (talk) 18:26, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and North America. Shellwood (talk) 19:58, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All sources seem to be based on the same 1859 travelogue. Even if accurate, this is a single source, and that's not enough for WP:GNG. Frankly it sounds like something a white settler made up one day. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:55, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Can't find anything that goes beyond repeating the same few lines from the original (dubious) sources. Gazamp (talk) 23:48, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - it's a NN hoax and something of a pernicious stereotype of Native Americans. Bearian (talk) 15:49, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dessert Hot Sauce

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

AI-generated article with fake sources; obviously created to promote Toad Sweat which was also created by the same editor and is now up for deletion. Could plausibly be G11'd but I brought it here just in case, and for consistency with WP:Articles for deletion/Toad Sweat. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 19:38, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 19:38, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. AI generated junk with fake references, and the one that isn't fake doesn't lend notability. Honestly, this should have been a PROD. nf utvol (talk) 19:49, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's not always meaningful to PROD, nf utvol. This would be a case in point, since when I PRODDED the sister article Toad Sweat, created by the same user the day before, the creator promptly removed the prod without any attempt to improve the article. I would expect the same action here. I believe rather it should have been a speedy. But now that it's here, the AFD may as well run, since that will make it harder to repeatedly recreate it. Bishonen | tålk 20:06, 27 February 2025 (UTC).[reply]
I see that now, oh well...sounds like that user is on their way to a possible ban for COI editing anyway. nf utvol (talk) 20:35, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This page was not intended for publication. It is intended to put a site on for some university students to work on to propose page for publication. Is there any manner in which the initial draft may be put in draft form for the students to work on for their class project? TJGuiton (talk) 21:04, 28 February 2025 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: TJGuiton (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. [reply]

@TJGuiton: This article is not acceptable even in draft form. If it had been created as a draft, it might still be deleted as spam. Everything you write on Wikipedia is "published" whether it's in mainspace or in draft form, and promotion is not allowed anywhere on Wikipedia.

Please explain your relationship to the university and the class professor/lecturer/students. It is a very bad idea to ask students to write an article about a specific topic, especially one where you have a conflict of interest. From a brief search, it is unlikely that this topic is sufficiently notable for any article to be written.

Finally, you still have not formally disclosed your conflict of interest with Toad Sweat. You are required to make a paid editing declaration as described on WP:PAID if you make any money from Toad Sweat, regardless of whether you were asked to edit Wikipedia. Because of your conflict of interest, you should only be submitting drafts through WP:Articles for creation instead of directly creating articles in mainspace. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 22:07, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: How can you tell this is AI slop? What are the malformed fingers of text AI? (Im not trying to defend this, I'm trying to learn). Moritoriko (talk) 09:29, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Inclusion of fake sources is a big tell. The article also has a generally essay-like and promotional tone, which is common for unspecialized AIs. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 09:53, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, promotional, fake references. Bishonen | tålk 20:06, 27 February 2025 (UTC).[reply]
It was a draft quickly posted for the university students to work on and it was never intended to be made public. Please share a manner for them to work on draft pages prior to publication yet allow them to work as a team on a page. It was never intended that the crap draft would be posted for public consumption. It was understood that there was a "chalkboard" or equivalent where drafts could be worked on before being posted widely on the main page of Wikipedia. TJGuiton (talk) 21:07, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Blatantly AI-generated promotional slop. Madeleine (talk) 20:48, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete just advertising. TBAN in sight. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:38, 27 February 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Delete Clearly AI generated and, as said above, promotional FarmerUpbeat (talk) 23:17, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete, AI slop with fake references —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 04:43, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As stated to Bishonen, it was a draft quickly posted for the university students to work on and it was never intended to be made public. Please share a manner for them to work on draft pages prior to publication yet allow them to work as a team on a page. It was never intended that the crap draft would be posted for public consumption. It was understood that there was a "chalkboard" or equivalent where drafts could be worked on before being posted widely on the main page of Wikipedia. Thank you in advance. TJGuiton (talk) 21:11, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, as pythoncoder and Xxanthippe state, this is effectively AI slop, far too common on the English Wikipedia nowadays.Plasticwonder (talk) 04:13, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Articles not written by humans with fabricated references should not be retained on Wikipedia. cyberdog958^Talk 06:31, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, this is nothing but AI slop. I agree with Cyberdog about this. 208.56.148.137 (talk) 04:04, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hunter (Indian beer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The parent company might satisfy Wikipedia's notability criteria for companies, but this beer brand does not. The sources do not provide sufficient substantial coverage of this brand required to satisfy ORGCRIT. Chanel Dsouza (talk) 08:43, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Chanel Dsouza (talk) 08:43, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Products, and Madhya Pradesh. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:45, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Were there a page for Som Distilleries, I would be inclined to merge the content into that page. As there is not, I would go for Delete per nom. nf utvol (talk) 12:53, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://medium.com/@somindia/amazing-attributes-of-the-hunter-strongest-beer-in-india-d1680783c6dd

https://untappd.com/b/som-distilleries-and-breweries-hunter-super-strong-premium-beer/495061

it is one of highest selling beers in india

https://www.angelone.in/news/hunter-dominates-strong-beer-sales-in-delhi-for-may-2023 Baba199209 (talk) 17:11, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://medium.com/@somindia/amazing-attributes-of-the-hunter-strongest-beer-in-india-d1680783c6dd

https://untappd.com/b/som-distilleries-and-breweries-hunter-super-strong-premium-beer/495061

it is one of highest selling beers in india

https://www.angelone.in/news/hunter-dominates-strong-beer-sales-in-delhi-for-may-2023

Baba199209 (talk) 17:12, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:20, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Josep Roca i Fontané

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BEFORE shows some mentions in online news, but only incidental coverage, and not enough to demonstrate notability under WP:GNG. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:38, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Wine, and Spain. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:38, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:21, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:24, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verwurelter

Purge server cache

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Food and drink

Contents

Food and drink

Olesia Ostafiieva

Cristina Cleghorn

Sun Crush

Paniel Meat Processing

Chinook olives

Dessert Hot Sauce

Hunter (Indian beer)

Josep Roca i Fontané

Proposed deletions

Templates for Discussion